CII Fuel Mix Correction
Quantify how a multi-fuel bunker mix (LNG, methanol, ammonia, biofuel blends, drop-in replacements) changes the attained CII relative to a baseline single-fuel reference. The principal tool for evaluating CII benefit of fuel switching, biofuel pilot purchases and dual-fuel operation under MEPC.336(76).
Formula, assumptions, and limits
| Symbol | Meaning | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Attained CII if 100% baseline fuel were burned | g CO₂/(cap·nm) | |
| Attained CII for the actual mix | g CO₂/(cap·nm) | |
| Mass of baseline fuel (energy-equivalent) | t | |
| Mass of fuel in the actual mix | t | |
| , | Tank-to-wake CO₂ conversion factor | t CO₂/t fuel |
| , | Lower calorific value | MJ/kg |
| Total bunker energy | MJ | |
| Energy share of fuel in the mix | fraction | |
| DWT (cargo) or GT (ro-pax / cruise) | t or - | |
| Distance travelled in the reporting year | nm |
Source: IMO Resolution [MEPC.336(76)](https://www.imo.org) - 2021 Guidelines on operational CII; IMO Resolution [MEPC.337(76)](https://www.imo.org) - Reference lines; IMO Resolution [MEPC.338(76)](https://www.imo.org) - Reduction factors; IMO Resolution [MEPC.339(76)](https://www.imo.org) - Rating boundaries; IMO Resolution [MEPC.364(79)](https://www.imo.org) - Cf factors
In short
Quantify how a multi-fuel bunker mix changes attained CII relative to a single-fuel baseline. Covers LNG, methanol, ammonia, biofuel blends and dual-fuel operation under MEPC.336(76) and MEPC.364(79).