Background: PSSA framework + A.982(24) 2005 criteria update
A Particularly Sensitive Sea Area is an area recognised by the International Maritime Organization as needing special protection through IMO action because of its ecological, socio-economic or scientific significance and its vulnerability to damage from international shipping. The framework began with Assembly Resolution A.720(17) of 1991, was refined through Resolution A.885(21) of 1999 and Resolution A.927(22) of 29 November 2001, and reached its modern form in Assembly Resolution A.982(24) of 1 December 2005, the Revised Guidelines for the Identification and Designation of Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas. A.982(24) superseded A.927(22) and is the operative instrument under which the Saba Bank PSSA was designated in October 2008.
The 2005 revision introduced four substantive refinements relative to A.927(22). First, the eleven-element ecological criteria catalogue was clarified with sharper definitions for uniqueness, critical habitat, dependency, representativeness, diversity, productivity, spawning or breeding grounds, naturalness, integrity, vulnerability and bio-geographic importance. Second, the socio-cultural and economic criteria were strengthened to include explicit references to dependency of coastal communities on marine resources and to cultural heritage values. Third, the scientific and educational criteria were elaborated to address research value, baseline, monitoring and education. Fourth, the procedural rules for Associated Protective Measures (APMs) were tightened: APMs must be drawn from existing IMO instruments, must be technically and operationally feasible, must be enforceable, and must be specifically tied to the identified vulnerability of the area to international shipping.
The Saba Bank designation in 2008 was a substantive test of the revised framework. The Dutch submission to MEPC anchored the proposal on the eleven-element ecological criteria, the socio-economic value of the bank to Saban fisheries and the broader Dutch Caribbean tourism economy, and the scientific value as a long-studied submerged atoll system. Crucially, the Dutch proposal adopted mandatory APMs (a binding ATBA and a binding No-Anchoring Area) from the outset, drawing the operational lesson from the Sabana-Camagüey PSSA experience that advisory APMs alone provide limited enforcement reach against foreign-flag transit.
The PSSA framework rests on three criterion families: ecological, socio-cultural and economic, and scientific and educational. A coastal state proposes the designation through MEPC, identifying the area, presenting the criteria evidence, and proposing APMs. Where the APMs include routeing measures or mandatory reporting, the proposal is referred in parallel to the NCSR Sub-Committee (formerly NAV) and to the Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) for adoption of the SOLAS-anchored measures. Without binding APMs the PSSA is essentially an awareness designation; with binding APMs it is an enforceable regulatory regime that integrates with SOLAS Chapter V routeing instruments.
Saba Bank: 2008 MEPC.226(58) designation; APMs in force 2012
Resolution MEPC.226(58) was adopted at the fifty-eighth session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee in October 2008, designating the Saba Bank as a Particularly Sensitive Sea Area with two Associated Protective Measures: an Area to be Avoided under SOLAS Chapter V Regulation 10 prohibiting transit by ships of 300 GT and above, and a No-Anchoring Area for ships of 500 GT and above over the bank summit. The Dutch delegation, led by the Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management (now the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management) with technical support from the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality and the Saba Conservation Foundation, submitted the proposal as MEPC 57/19 in 2008 with subsequent revisions for the October 2008 session.
The two routeing APMs were referred to the IMO Sub-Committee on Safety of Navigation (NAV), which approved the routeing measures at NAV 54 in 2008, and to the Maritime Safety Committee (MSC), which adopted the routeing measures as MSC.1/Circ.1340 and consequential amendments to the IMO Ships’ Routeing publication. The combined IMO process required parallel MEPC adoption of the PSSA designation and MSC adoption of the SOLAS-anchored routeing measures, a sequencing pattern that has become standard for binding-APM PSSAs since 2005.
The APMs entered into force on 1 December 2012, four years after the MEPC.226(58) adoption. The four-year lead reflected the operational requirements of chart updating, notice to mariners distribution by the Netherlands Hydrographic Office, the United Kingdom Hydrographic Office (UKHO), the United States National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (US NGA), the Canadian Hydrographic Service and commercial chart publishers, and the build-up of Saban enforcement capacity through the Saba Bank Management Unit. The IMO Secretariat published the designation in the IMO Ships’ Routeing publication, with consequent integration into ECDIS chart libraries and bridge-team voyage-planning workflows for vessels routeing through the north-east Caribbean.
The designation was largely uncontested at MEPC 58, with broad regional support from CARICOM members, France, the United States, the United Kingdom and the Cartagena Convention parties. No formal objection was raised by any flag state, reflecting the strong ecological-criteria evidence base and the proportionate nature of the proposed APMs.
Geography: 2,200 km² largest submerged atoll in the Atlantic
The Saba Bank is a submerged carbonate atoll located approximately 5 km south-west of the Dutch Caribbean island of Saba in the north-east Caribbean Sea, between latitudes approximately 17 degrees 15 minutes north and 17 degrees 40 minutes north, and longitudes approximately 63 degrees 10 minutes west and 63 degrees 50 minutes west. The bank covers approximately 2,200 square kilometres in surface area on the flat top, making it the largest submerged atoll in the Atlantic Ocean and one of the three largest submerged atolls globally alongside the Great Chagos Bank in the British Indian Ocean Territory and the Saya de Malha Bank in the western Indian Ocean.
The bank lies on the eastern edge of the Northern Antilles inner arc between the volcanic islands of Saba and Sint Eustatius to the north-east and the deeper Caribbean basin to the south-west. It is geologically distinct from both the volcanic island arc and the deeper basin, representing a fossil reef-platform system that grew through the Miocene and Pliocene and was submerged through Pleistocene and Holocene sea-level rise without re-emergence as an island. The bank is approximately 60 to 65 km long on its long axis (north-east to south-west) and approximately 35 to 40 km wide, with a roughly oval to elongated outline shaped by underlying tectonic structure and karstic dissolution patterns from the last glacial low-stand.
The boundary of the Saba Bank PSSA, as defined by Resolution MEPC.226(58), follows a polygon enclosing the bank summit and adjacent slope habitat, with coordinates published in the Resolution and reflected in subsequent IMO Ships’ Routeing updates. The boundary intentionally extends slightly beyond the strict bank summit to capture the upper slope habitat that supports continuous reef and sponge community structure, and to provide an operational buffer for the ATBA enforcement.
The Saba Bank lies entirely within the Dutch Caribbean Exclusive Economic Zone, declared by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on 10 June 2010 following the constitutional reform that brought the BES islands (Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, Saba) under direct Dutch jurisdiction. The EEZ declaration was the legal predicate for the post-2010 enforcement architecture, although the IMO PSSA designation in 2008 had already established the international regulatory baseline.
Bathymetry: 20-100m flat top, 100-1000m drop-offs
The bathymetry of Saba Bank reflects the structural and depositional history of the platform. The flat-topped summit varies in depth from approximately 20 metres at the shallowest pinnacles to approximately 100 metres along the northern and western margins, with most of the summit area between 30 and 50 metres depth.
The shallowest features include a series of named pinnacles and reef knolls including the Overall Bank in the central section at approximately 20 metres depth, the Western Bank at 25 to 30 metres, and several smaller emergent-reef features along the eastern margin. The flat-topped morphology reflects wave-base erosion during repeated Pleistocene sea-level low-stands, when the bank summit emerged or was very nearly emergent, with subsequent re-submergence and reef regrowth.
The bank slopes drop steeply from the flat top to the surrounding deeper water. The northern and eastern slopes drop to 100 to 300 metres within a few kilometres of the bank edge before continuing to deeper basin floors. The southern and western slopes drop more steeply to 300 to 1,000 metres within similar horizontal distance, reflecting the structural geometry of the underlying carbonate platform and the proximity to the Caribbean basin.
The slope habitat hosts mesophotic coral and sponge communities, deep-water fish assemblages, and seasonal pelagic transit zones for cetaceans and large pelagic fish. The slope-summit transition is a productive ecological zone with strong upwelling-driven nutrient flux at certain seasons and locations, supporting elevated reef-fish productivity at specific reef-pass and pinnacle sites.
The bathymetric configuration also creates the ship-strike risk profile that motivates the ATBA. The shallowest pinnacles at 20 metres depth pose a grounding risk to deep-draft vessels, and the abrupt slope-summit transition increases the consequence of any course deviation off the recommended deep-water routes. Pre-2008 incident records, including the 1965 Wim Sonneveld grounding and several smaller incidents, established the practical risk basis for the binding ATBA.
Coral reef biodiversity (~150 species)
The coral and octocoral inventory of Saba Bank documents approximately 150 species across stony corals and octocorals, one of the highest species counts for any single Caribbean reef system relative to its area.
Stony coral species include the characteristic Caribbean reef-building taxa: Acropora palmata (elkhorn) and Acropora cervicornis (staghorn) at shallower sites where these now-Critically Endangered species persist; the boulder corals Orbicella annularis, Orbicella faveolata and Orbicella franksi (formerly Montastraea) which dominate the mesophotic depth band; the brain corals Diploria labyrinthiformis, Pseudodiploria strigosa and Pseudodiploria clivosa; the star corals Siderastrea siderea and Siderastrea radians; the lettuce corals Agaricia agaricites, Agaricia lamarcki and Agaricia grahamae, the latter two extending into mesophotic depths to 70 metres or more; the fire coral Millepora alcicornis; and a suite of smaller Faviidae, Mussidae and Caryophylliidae taxa.
Octocoral species include the gorgonian sea fans Gorgonia ventalina and Gorgonia flabellum, the sea plumes Pseudopterogorgia americana and Pseudopterogorgia acerosa, the sea rods Plexaurella species, and the colourful soft corals of the genera Eunicea and Pterogorgia. The octocoral assemblage on Saba Bank is particularly rich, reflecting the variety of slope and summit habitats and the reduced human stress relative to many comparable Caribbean reefs.
The mesophotic coral ecosystem at 30 to 100 metres depth on Saba Bank is one of the best-documented Caribbean mesophotic systems, with research expeditions from Wageningen Marine Research, the Smithsonian Institution, the University of the Netherlands Antilles (now Anton de Kom University), and the Saba Conservation Foundation documenting depth zonation, species turnover and community structure. The mesophotic component is significant because it serves as a partial refuge from shallow-water bleaching, fishing pressure and physical disturbance, supporting potential larval supply to shallower zones and the regional reef network.
Coral cover varies across the bank from approximately 5 to 25 percent depending on depth, exposure and historical disturbance. The 2005 and 2010 Caribbean-wide bleaching events affected Saba Bank shallower reefs, with documented partial recovery at most monitored sites. The 2023 and 2024-2025 mass-bleaching events also affected the bank, with assessment ongoing through the Saba Bank Management Unit monitoring programme.
Fish biodiversity (>200 species: Nassau grouper, parrotfish, queen triggerfish)
The fish inventory of Saba Bank documents more than 200 species across the bank summit, slope and adjacent pelagic transit zones.
The grouper assemblage includes the Nassau grouper (Epinephelus striatus), classed as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List, with documented spawning aggregations at specific reef-pass sites on Saba Bank that have been monitored since the early 2000s. The black grouper (Mycteroperca bonaci), yellowfin grouper (Mycteroperca venenosa), tiger grouper (Mycteroperca tigris) and red grouper (Epinephelus morio) also occur on the bank in significant numbers. The goliath grouper (Epinephelus itajara), Critically Endangered globally, has been documented occasionally on the deeper slopes.
The snapper assemblage includes the mutton snapper (Lutjanus analis), cubera snapper (Lutjanus cyanopterus), yellowtail snapper (Ocyurus chrysurus), dog snapper (Lutjanus jocu) and schoolmaster snapper (Lutjanus apodus). Mutton and cubera snapper spawning aggregations have been documented at specific bank sites, providing both fishery resource and ecological function.
The parrotfish assemblage is exceptionally rich, with documented species including the rainbow parrotfish (Scarus guacamaia), the largest Caribbean herbivorous fish and a flagship indicator of intact reef ecosystems; the midnight parrotfish (Scarus coelestinus); the stoplight parrotfish (Sparisoma viride); the redband parrotfish (Sparisoma aurofrenatum); the queen parrotfish (Scarus vetula); and the princess parrotfish (Scarus taeniopterus). Parrotfish biomass on Saba Bank is among the highest documented for any Caribbean reef, reflecting the limited fishing pressure under the Saba Conservation Foundation management regime.
The triggerfish assemblage includes the iconic queen triggerfish (Balistes vetula), the ocean triggerfish (Canthidermis sufflamen), the gray triggerfish (Balistes capriscus) and the black durgon (Melichthys niger).
Reef shark species include the Caribbean reef shark (Carcharhinus perezii), the nurse shark (Ginglymostoma cirratum) and the occasional tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier). The shark assemblage on Saba Bank is more intact than in most Caribbean reef systems, reflecting the absence of large-scale shark fishing under the Saba Conservation Foundation management regime and the support of the Dutch Caribbean shark sanctuary declaration.
Pelagic and large-pelagic species transit the bank seasonally, including wahoo (Acanthocybium solandri), king mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla), yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares), blackfin tuna (Thunnus atlanticus), dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus), blue marlin (Makaira nigricans) and white marlin (Kajikia albida).
Humpback whale winter calving grounds
The Saba Bank and adjacent north-east Caribbean waters are seasonal winter calving and breeding grounds for the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) population that summers in the Gulf of Maine, the Gulf of St Lawrence, the Greenland Sea and the Norwegian Sea before migrating south to the Caribbean for breeding between January and April each year.
The North Atlantic humpback population is estimated at approximately 11,000 to 14,000 individuals as of mid-2020s assessments, with the Caribbean breeding range concentrated in the Silver Bank off the Dominican Republic, the Navidad Bank, and the broader north-east Caribbean including Saba Bank waters. Saba Bank has been documented as a secondary but significant winter humpback site, with peak abundance in February and March each year.
Saba Bank humpback observations include calving cows with newborn calves, mother-calf-escort triads, singing males, and competitive groups during the active breeding period. The Saba Conservation Foundation, the Dutch Caribbean Nature Alliance (DCNA), the Caribbean Cetacean Society and visiting researchers from Wageningen, the United States and France have contributed to long-term photo-identification databases that link Saba Bank humpbacks to north-Atlantic feeding grounds.
The PSSA designation provides incidental but meaningful protection for the seasonal humpback aggregation. The ATBA reduces the risk of vessel strikes during the breeding season; the No-Anchoring Area reduces noise and disturbance from anchoring activity; and the broader awareness designation supports the integrated management of the Yarari Marine Mammal and Shark Sanctuary, declared by the Dutch government in 2015 covering the EEZ of Saba and Bonaire and overlaying the Saba Bank PSSA.
Associated Protective Measure 1: Area to be Avoided (mandatory SOLAS V/10)
The first APM under MEPC.226(58) is the Area to be Avoided (ATBA), a binding routeing measure under SOLAS Chapter V Regulation 10 prohibiting transit through the defined area by ships of 300 gross tonnage and above. The ATBA was approved by the IMO NAV Sub-Committee in 2008, adopted by the MSC, and entered into force on 1 December 2012.
The ATBA boundary follows the outer slope of the Saba Bank, enclosing the entire bank summit and the immediate slope habitat, with coordinates published in MEPC.226(58) and in the IMO Ships’ Routeing publication. The ATBA covers approximately the same footprint as the broader PSSA, ensuring that the binding routeing measure is co-extensive with the ecological protection objective.
Affected vessel categories include all ships of 300 GT and above, which captures the substantial majority of international commercial transit traffic in the north-east Caribbean: container ships, tankers, bulk carriers, ro-ro vessels, large general cargo ships, large fishing vessels, large cruise ships, and most offshore service vessels. Smaller vessels below 300 GT, including most yachts, dive boats, small inter-island ferries and small fishing vessels, are not covered by the ATBA but are typically subject to the parallel No-Anchoring Area and to local Saba Conservation Foundation regulations.
Compliance is enforced through several complementary mechanisms. The Netherlands Coastguard and the Saba-based Dutch Caribbean Coast Guard monitor AIS-broadcast vessel positions across the EEZ, with automated alerting on ATBA intrusion. The Saba Bank Management Unit conducts surface and aerial patrols. Flag state action against intruding vessels is pursued through the Memorandum of Understanding mechanisms in the Caribbean Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (Caribbean MoU). Where the intruding vessel is in subsequent transit through Dutch ports or other MoU member ports, the port-state-control inspection mechanism may capture follow-up enforcement action.
The ATBA is integrated into ECDIS chart libraries and bridge-team voyage-planning workflows. Vessels routeing through the north-east Caribbean between the Atlantic, the Caribbean basin and the Gulf of Mexico typically follow tracks well clear of the bank, either to the north through the Anegada Passage or the Sombrero Passage and around the north of Saba and Sint Eustatius, or to the south of the bank through deep water. The ATBA imposes a modest additional voyage cost in deviation distance, typically less than 20 nautical miles for most route geometries, which is operationally acceptable to the global shipping industry given the documented ecological value.
Associated Protective Measure 2: No-Anchoring Area ≥500 GT
The second APM under MEPC.226(58) is the No-Anchoring Area (NAA), a binding measure prohibiting anchoring by ships of 500 gross tonnage and above over the bank summit. The NAA boundary covers the principal coral reef and sponge community zones on the flat top of the bank, where anchor and chain physical contact would damage benthic habitat.
The NAA was approved alongside the ATBA at NAV 54 in 2008, adopted by the MSC, and entered into force on 1 December 2012. The NAA is operationally complementary to the ATBA: the ATBA prevents transit by 300 GT and above vessels except in distress or genuine emergency; the NAA prevents anchoring by 500 GT and above vessels even where they are legitimately present (for example, in scientific research, in emergency response, or where exceptional circumstances justify presence).
The 500 GT threshold for the NAA reflects the operational reality that smaller vessels, including dive boats, research vessels under 500 GT, small ferries and small fishing vessels, may have legitimate need to anchor within the bank for short-duration scientific, conservation or emergency purposes. The NAA threshold accommodates these smaller-vessel needs while excluding the large-vessel anchoring that poses the principal benthic-impact risk through anchor and chain damage on coral and sponge habitat.
Pre-2012 anchoring incidents on Saba Bank, particularly involving large fishing vessels, cargo vessels in passage stop, and the occasional cruise ship, contributed to the practical case for the NAA. Anchor scour scars in coral and sponge habitat on the bank were documented through diver and ROV surveys conducted by the Saba Conservation Foundation and visiting research groups, providing the empirical basis for the NAA boundary and the GT threshold.
Enforcement of the NAA combines AIS monitoring (vessel position and reported anchor status), the Saba Bank Management Unit patrol presence, port-state-control follow-up through the Caribbean MoU, and flag-state action where appropriate. The combined ATBA and NAA enforcement architecture has produced documented compliance rates of approximately 95 percent in post-2012 monitoring, a substantial improvement on the pre-PSSA baseline and on the operational record of advisory-only PSSAs.
Dutch Caribbean EEZ (declared 2010) jurisdictional context
The Kingdom of the Netherlands declared the Dutch Caribbean Exclusive Economic Zone on 10 June 2010, in connection with the broader constitutional reform that took effect on 10 October 2010 and brought the BES islands of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba under direct Dutch jurisdiction as special municipalities of the Netherlands. The Dutch Caribbean EEZ extends 200 nautical miles from the baselines of the BES islands and the constituent countries of Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten, covering approximately 92,000 square kilometres of marine territory.
Saba Bank lies entirely within the BES islands’ EEZ sector, specifically within the EEZ of Saba. The EEZ declaration provided the legal predicate for several post-2010 marine management measures: the Saba Bank National Park declaration of December 2010; the Yarari Marine Mammal and Shark Sanctuary of 2015 covering Saba and Bonaire EEZ waters; the Dutch Caribbean shark sanctuary declarations; and the integrated marine spatial planning processes coordinated by the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality.
The relationship between the IMO PSSA designation (October 2008) and the EEZ declaration (June 2010) is operationally significant. The PSSA designation in 2008 preceded the formal EEZ declaration by approximately 20 months, with the IMO process anchored on the Netherlands’ status as a coastal state under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) without depending on a formal EEZ proclamation. The post-2010 EEZ declaration provided enhanced sovereign-jurisdiction support for enforcement of the PSSA APMs, extending the reach of Dutch maritime authorities across the full 200-nautical-mile zone.
Dutch coastguard and naval enforcement assets in the Caribbean include the Netherlands Caribbean Coast Guard (Kustwacht voor het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden in het Caribisch Gebied) headquartered in Curaçao with operational bases in Aruba, Sint Maarten and Bonaire; the Royal Netherlands Navy Caribbean detachment, including the rotating West-Indies station ship; and the joint Caribbean Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement mechanisms with the United States Coast Guard, the French navy and other partners.
BES islands special-municipality status (since 2010)
The constitutional reform of 10 October 2010 dissolved the Netherlands Antilles (Nederlandse Antillen) and reorganised the Dutch Caribbean into the four constituent countries of the Kingdom of the Netherlands (the European Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten) plus the BES islands of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba as special municipalities (bijzondere gemeenten) of the European Netherlands.
The BES designation gives the three islands a status equivalent to ordinary Dutch municipalities for most administrative purposes, with direct application of Dutch national law subject to specific BES-island variations through the Caribbean Netherlands Public Bodies Act (Wet openbare lichamen Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba, WolBES). The Dutch national Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations coordinates BES-island governance, with sectoral ministries (Infrastructure and Water Management, Agriculture and Nature, Health, Education) providing direct administration on the islands.
Saba (population approximately 1,900 as of mid-2020s) is the smallest of the three BES islands at approximately 13 square kilometres of land area. The island is dominated by Mount Scenery, a dormant volcano of approximately 877 metres elevation that is the highest point in the Kingdom of the Netherlands. The Saba economy combines tourism (particularly dive tourism), the Saba University School of Medicine, public-sector employment, and traditional fisheries that have historically used the Saba Bank as the primary fishing ground.
The BES status has direct relevance to Saba Bank PSSA management. The Dutch national Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit, LNV) holds the formal management responsibility for the Saba Bank National Park, with day-to-day operational management delegated to the Saba Conservation Foundation through the Saba Bank Management Unit under contract. Dutch national environmental law applies to the BES islands’ marine environment, with implementation through the Public Bodies and through the LNV ministry. The IMO PSSA designation, originally submitted by the Dutch government in 2008 prior to the BES reform, has been administered post-2010 within the BES-integrated governance framework.
Saba Bank Management Unit (SBMU) of the Saba Conservation Foundation
The Saba Bank Management Unit (SBMU) is the operational management arm for the Saba Bank PSSA, the Saba Bank National Park, and the Saba Bank Ramsar site. The SBMU is a sub-unit of the Saba Conservation Foundation (SCF), an established non-governmental conservation organisation that manages the Saba National Marine Park (around the island), the Mount Scenery National Park (on the island) and the Saba Bank protected areas.
The Saba Conservation Foundation was established in 1987 and is one of the longest-established conservation NGOs in the Dutch Caribbean. Its core mandate is the protection of the natural heritage of Saba and the Saba Bank through marine and terrestrial park management, scientific monitoring, education, and engagement with the Saban community. The SCF is funded through a combination of Dutch national subsidy, BES public-body contributions, dive-tourism fees, donor philanthropy, and project-specific funding from international partners.
The SBMU was established in 2010 in connection with the Saba Bank National Park declaration, and operates as the primary management interface between the Dutch government, the international scientific community, and the Saban fisheries and tourism sectors. SBMU staff include a manager, marine biologists, ranger and patrol staff, monitoring technicians, and education and outreach staff. The unit operates surface vessels for patrol and monitoring, conducts scientific surveys in partnership with academic institutions, and engages with the international AIS monitoring services for ATBA and NAA compliance assessment.
The SBMU produces an annual report covering compliance, ecological monitoring, scientific publications, fishery interactions, and management actions. The annual reports through the 2010s and 2020s have documented progressively higher AIS-monitored ATBA compliance rates (approximately 95 percent in the most recent reports), continued ecological monitoring time series, and engagement with the Saban fishing community to refine the operational interface between the PSSA and traditional fisheries.
Ramsar site #1957 designation (2012)
The Saba Bank was designated as a Wetland of International Importance under the Ramsar Convention on 8 February 2012, registered as Ramsar site number 1957 in the Ramsar Sites Information Service. The designation covers approximately 268,000 hectares (2,680 square kilometres) of submerged atoll, reef, sponge community and slope habitat, with a boundary essentially co-extensive with the IMO PSSA designation.
The Ramsar designation qualifies under multiple criteria of the Ramsar Convention. Criterion 1 (representative wetland type) is met by the bank as the largest submerged atoll in the Atlantic and a globally significant example of a tropical carbonate platform. Criterion 2 (vulnerable, endangered or critically endangered species) is met by the Nassau grouper, the goliath grouper, the rainbow parrotfish, the elkhorn and staghorn corals, several sea-turtle species, and the seasonal humpback whale presence. Criterion 3 (biological diversity) is met by the documented inventory of approximately 150 coral species, more than 200 fish species, extensive sponge and macroalgal communities, and reef-associated invertebrates. Criterion 4 (life-cycle stage support) is met by the documented spawning aggregations of Nassau grouper and other commercially significant fish, and by the seasonal humpback calving and breeding presence. Criterion 7 (fish indicator species) is met by the diverse fish assemblage. Criterion 8 (fishery support) is met by the role of Saba Bank as the primary fishing ground for Saban artisanal fisheries.
The Ramsar designation provides international legal recognition complementary to the IMO PSSA, obligations for periodic reporting under the Ramsar Information Sheet system, eligibility for the Ramsar Small Grants Fund and Wetlands for the Future funding, and integration with the broader Ramsar network of approximately 2,500 sites globally and approximately 90 sites in the Caribbean and Latin American region. The Saba Bank Ramsar designation is one of the largest and most ecologically significant marine Ramsar sites in the Caribbean.
Saba Bank National Park (declared 2010)
The Saba Bank National Park was declared by the Government of the Netherlands on 15 December 2010, immediately following the BES constitutional reform of October 2010 and in close coordination with the formal Dutch Caribbean EEZ declaration of June 2010. The National Park covers the same approximate footprint as the IMO PSSA, approximately 2,680 square kilometres including the bank summit and adjacent slope habitat.
The National Park designation operates under the Dutch Nature Conservation Act for the BES Islands (Wet grondslagen natuurbeheer- en bescherming BES) and provides domestic-law protection complementary to the IMO PSSA’s international regulatory protection. The park designation enables specific restrictions on fishing, anchoring, scientific research, dive tourism and other activities, with enforcement through the BES public-body authorities and the Saba Conservation Foundation under contract to the LNV ministry.
The Saba Bank National Park sits within the broader Dutch Caribbean protected-area system, alongside the Bonaire National Marine Park (declared 1979, one of the oldest marine parks in the Caribbean), the Sint Eustatius National Marine Park, the Saba National Marine Park (around the island, declared 1987), the Mount Scenery National Park on Saba, and the broader Yarari Marine Mammal and Shark Sanctuary declared in 2015.
The relationship between the IMO PSSA, the Ramsar site, the BES National Park and the Yarari Sanctuary creates a multi-layered protection regime: the IMO PSSA addresses ship-source threats through binding ATBA and NAA routeing measures; the Ramsar designation provides international wetland-conservation recognition and reporting obligations; the National Park provides domestic-law protection with operational management and enforcement; the Yarari Sanctuary provides species-specific protection for marine mammals and sharks across the broader EEZ.
Pre-2010 fishing + ship-strike history (e.g., Wim Sonneveld 1965)
The pre-2010 history of human use of the Saba Bank is dominated by Saban artisanal fisheries and by occasional ship-strike incidents reflecting the bank’s location in approach waters to the north-east Caribbean.
Saban fisheries on the bank trace back to the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, when Saban fishermen operating from Fort Bay and Cove Bay on the south coast of Saba developed a sustained fishery for red hind grouper (Epinephelus guttatus), silk snapper (Lutjanus vivanus), queen triggerfish, spiny lobster (Panulirus argus), and several pelagic species. The fishery has historically been the principal Saban export industry alongside the small island agriculture and the export of the Saba Lace (handicraft). The Saba fishing fleet through the twentieth century numbered between 8 and 15 vessels, predominantly small motor boats of 5 to 12 metres length, operating day-trip and multi-day trips on the bank.
Ship-strike incidents on the bank pre-2010 include several documented groundings and near-groundings reflecting the navigational challenge of the shallow bank surrounded by deep water without an emergent island marker. The most famous incident is the 1965 grounding of the MV Wim Sonneveld, a Dutch coastal cargo vessel that grounded on the bank while transiting between St Maarten and Curaçao. The Wim Sonneveld grounding caused localised reef damage, fuel and cargo loss, and contributed to the Saban community’s recognition that the bank required formal navigational warning and protective measures. Additional smaller-vessel groundings, fishing-vessel strandings and reef-anchor incidents accumulated through the late twentieth century, supporting the pre-2008 case for the eventual PSSA designation.
The fishery interaction with the bank has evolved through the post-2010 management regime. The Saba Conservation Foundation, through the SBMU, has engaged with the Saban fishing community to refine the operational rules, including catch limits for Nassau grouper and other vulnerable species, gear restrictions to reduce incidental coral and sponge damage, and the integration of fishery monitoring into the broader scientific data series. The Saban fishery remains the principal ongoing human use of the bank under the post-2012 PSSA regime, with the international shipping industry’s interaction limited to the perimeter routes outside the ATBA boundary.
NCSR Sub-Committee 2008 routeing approval
The IMO Sub-Committee on Safety of Navigation (NAV), since renamed the Sub-Committee on Navigation, Communications and Search and Rescue (NCSR), approved the Saba Bank routeing measures (ATBA and NAA) at NAV 54 in July 2008, in parallel with the MEPC 58 PSSA designation later in October 2008.
The NAV process involves technical review of the proposed routeing measures against IMO standards, including: route geometry and boundary coordinates; alignment with the underlying navigational risk profile; consistency with existing IMO Ships’ Routeing publications; technical feasibility and bridge-team operational practicality; and procedural compliance with SOLAS Chapter V Regulation 10. The Dutch submission to NAV 54 included detailed bathymetric, ecological and traffic-flow evidence supporting the boundary geometry and the GT thresholds.
The NAV 54 approval was uncontested, with broad flag-state support including from the United States, the United Kingdom, Liberia, Marshall Islands, Panama, Singapore, Greece, Norway and Japan. The MSC subsequently adopted the routeing measures through MSC.1/Circ.1340 and consequential amendments to the IMO Ships’ Routeing publication, with the four-year phase-in to the December 2012 effective date supporting orderly chart updating and operational integration.
The NCSR Sub-Committee role illustrates the parallel-track nature of the IMO PSSA process for binding-APM PSSAs. The MEPC adopts the PSSA designation and recognises the proposed APMs in principle; the NAV/NCSR Sub-Committee provides the technical review and approval of routeing measures; the MSC adopts the routeing measures as binding instruments under SOLAS Chapter V Regulation 10. All three IMO bodies must complete their processes for a binding-APM PSSA to enter into force, a procedural feature that has shaped the post-2005 PSSA designation pattern under A.982(24).
Post-2012 AIS-monitored compliance (~95%)
The post-2012 enforcement record of the Saba Bank ATBA and NAA has been documented through AIS monitoring conducted by the Saba Bank Management Unit, the Netherlands Caribbean Coast Guard, and academic and NGO partners. The compliance record is one of the strongest among PSSAs globally and provides empirical support for the binding-APM PSSA model.
The 95 percent compliance figure reflects the proportion of vessels of the affected GT thresholds that respected the ATBA and NAA boundaries during the monitored period since December 2012. The remaining 5 percent of intrusions are characterised in SBMU reporting as a mix of: vessels in genuine emergency or distress (permitted under SOLAS V/10); vessels with broken or transmitting-incorrect AIS data (technical issue); a small number of foreign-flag vessels with apparently inadvertent course deviations (typically corrected after VHF or AIS-text intervention); and a very small number of apparent deliberate intrusions (subject to flag-state notification and Caribbean MoU follow-up).
The Caribbean MoU on Port State Control inspection mechanism has provided documented downstream enforcement on at least several apparent intrusions, with port-state inspections in Dutch, French, US and other Caribbean ports examining bridge logs, AIS records and voyage plans for evidence of ATBA breach. Flag-state notifications through Dutch diplomatic channels have also been used in selected cases.
The compliance record is favourable in part because the ATBA does not impose a material additional voyage cost on most vessels routeing through the north-east Caribbean. The natural great-circle and rhumb-line tracks between the Atlantic and the Caribbean basin pass either north or south of the bank rather than across it, with the ATBA simply codifying a routeing pattern that is already operationally rational. This contrasts with PSSAs where the binding measure imposes substantial diversion (for example, the Tubbataha PSSA, where the ATBA materially changes the South China Sea-Sulu Sea routeing geometry).
The 95 percent compliance figure also reflects the success of the parallel awareness and education programme conducted by the SBMU, the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, and the IMO Secretariat through the IMO Ships’ Routeing publication and through industry channels including BIMCO, INTERTANKO, INTERCARGO, the World Shipping Council and the Cruise Lines International Association.
2018 expansion proposal (rejected by IMO MEPC)
A 2018 Dutch expansion proposal for the Saba Bank PSSA, submitted to MEPC for consideration, sought to extend the PSSA boundary and the ATBA to cover additional slope and adjacent pelagic habitat north and east of the existing 2008-designated area. The proposal was motivated by improved bathymetric and ecological evidence for the broader bank-slope-pelagic continuum, by documented humpback whale aggregations beyond the existing PSSA boundary, and by the precautionary objective of buffering the bank against potential future shipping-route shifts.
The 2018 proposal was reviewed at MEPC in 2018 and was not adopted, principally on the grounds that the additional ecological evidence presented for the expansion did not meet the A.982(24) threshold for a substantively distinct designation, and that the existing 2008 PSSA already provided adequate protection for the bank summit and immediate slope habitat. Several flag states raised technical questions about the boundary geometry and the operational impact of the proposed extension on routeing through the broader north-east Caribbean.
The Dutch delegation accepted the MEPC outcome and continued operational management under the existing 2008 designation, while preserving the option to revisit the expansion question if and when additional ecological or shipping-pattern evidence supports a renewed proposal. The 2018 outcome illustrates the operational reality of the PSSA process: even well-prepared and ecologically supported proposals must meet the procedural and substantive thresholds of A.982(24), and MEPC retains discretion to reject or defer proposals where the evidence base is judged insufficient.
Comparison to Sabana-Camagüey 1997 (mandatory vs advisory APMs)
The contrast between the Saba Bank PSSA (2008, mandatory APMs) and the Sabana-Camagüey PSSA (1997, advisory APMs) is one of the clearest case-comparisons in the global PSSA portfolio, illustrating the operational consequences of the binding-versus-advisory APM choice.
The Sabana-Camagüey PSSA covers approximately 75,000 square kilometres of north-central Cuban shelf, with APMs limited to advisory routeing recommendations, Cuban domestic MPA zoning, and non-binding pilotage advice. The Saba Bank PSSA covers approximately 2,200 square kilometres with binding ATBA and binding NAA under SOLAS V/10. The size disparity (Sabana-Camagüey is roughly 34 times larger by area) is partially offset by the difference in regulatory strength.
Operationally, the post-2012 Saba Bank compliance record (~95 percent AIS-monitored) is significantly stronger than the post-1997 Sabana-Camagüey record, which is documented principally as voluntary corridor adherence in the Old Bahama Channel without formal AIS-monitored intrusion accounting. The Sabana-Camagüey enforcement is constrained by the absence of binding routeing measures, by the United States embargo restrictions on multilateral cooperation, and by Cuban patrol-capacity limitations.
The comparison has informed subsequent PSSA designation practice. Post-2008 PSSAs have predominantly adopted binding APMs from the outset, drawing the operational lesson that mandatory routeing measures under SOLAS V/10 provide substantially stronger enforcement reach than advisory measures. The Tubbataha Reefs PSSA (2017), the Galapagos PSSA (2005), the Strait of Bonifacio PSSA (2011), and the Saba Bank PSSA (2008) all adopted binding ATBA from the outset, reflecting the matured framework under A.982(24).
The Cuban Plan de Acción Nacional 2017-2030 envisages possible future upgrade of the Sabana-Camagüey APMs to include binding measures, with explicit reference to the Saba Bank model as one operational template, although no formal MEPC submission has been tabled as of 2026.
Place in the global PSSA list (18 designations as of 2026)
The Saba Bank PSSA is one of approximately 18 IMO-designated PSSAs as of 2026. The list, in approximate chronological order, includes the Great Barrier Reef (Australia, 1990, extended 2005); the Sabana-Camagüey Archipelago (Cuba, 1997); Malpelo Island (Colombia, 2002); Florida Keys (United States, 2002); the Wadden Sea (Denmark-Germany-Netherlands, 2002); Paracas National Reserve (Peru, 2003); Western European Waters (2004); the Canary Islands (Spain, 2005); the Galapagos Archipelago (Ecuador, 2005); the Baltic Sea (2005); Papahānaumokuākea (United States, 2007); the Saba Bank (Netherlands, 2008/2012); the Strait of Bonifacio (France-Italy, 2011); the Torres Strait GBR extension (2005); the Jomard Entrance (Papua New Guinea, 2016); and the Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park (Philippines, 2017).
Saba Bank holds three significant historical positions in the global PSSA portfolio. First, it is one of the earliest PSSAs designated under A.982(24) with mandatory APMs, providing a template for subsequent binding-APM PSSA proposals. Second, it is the third PSSA designated in the Wider Caribbean Region after Sabana-Camagüey (1997) and Florida Keys (2002), and the smallest of the three by area. Third, it is the only Atlantic submerged-atoll PSSA, illustrating the application of the framework to a distinctive geomorphic and ecological setting that does not fit the more familiar fringing-reef, archipelago or shelf-system templates of other Caribbean designations.
A common confusion in commercial and academic discussion is the categorisation of Tubbataha Reefs (Philippines, 2017) as a Caribbean PSSA. Tubbataha is in the Sulu Sea in the western Pacific, not in the Caribbean, and represents a separate biogeographic and regulatory context. The peer comparison set for Saba Bank within the Caribbean comprises principally Sabana-Camagüey, Florida Keys and (more loosely) the broader Cartagena Convention and SPAW Protocol network. For the global picture of the PSSA framework and the chronological evolution from A.720(17) through A.982(24), the PSSA overview provides the parent reference. The peer Sabana-Camagüey PSSA provides the principal Wider Caribbean comparison.
Formula, assumptions, and limits
Formula
The Saba Bank PSSA boundary geometry is constructed as a polygon enclosing the submerged atoll summit and the immediate slope habitat, defined in WGS-84 coordinates published in MEPC.226(58) and reflected in subsequent IMO Ships’ Routeing updates. The principal area, depth and boundary metrics are:
The APM threshold metrics are:
The compliance metric since 1 December 2012 is:
Derivation
The 2,200 square kilometre figure derives from the bank summit area enclosed by the PSSA boundary polygon as defined in MEPC.226(58), measured by the Netherlands Hydrographic Office and confirmed through subsequent multi-beam bathymetric surveys conducted by the Royal Netherlands Navy survey vessels and visiting research vessels. The bank summit area in some sources is reported as 1,850 to 2,680 square kilometres depending on the precise depth contour used as the bank-edge definition (the 100 metre or 200 metre isobath being the most common alternatives).
The depth ranges of 20 to 100 metres on the flat top and 100 to 1,000 metres on the drop-offs reflect multi-beam bathymetric survey data, with the shallowest pinnacles documented near 20 metres depth and the deeper bank-edge transitions extending to 1,000 metres along the southern and western slopes.
The 150 coral species count reflects systematic surveys conducted by the Saba Conservation Foundation, Wageningen Marine Research, the University of Curaçao and visiting research expeditions through the 2000s, 2010s and early 2020s. The 200-plus fish species count reflects similar systematic surveys, with the species count expected to grow as further mesophotic depth band research is conducted.
The 300 GT ATBA threshold and the 500 GT NAA threshold derive from the technical assessment in the Dutch submission to NAV 54 in 2008, balancing the operational practicality of enforcing the measures against the navigational and benthic-impact risk profile of vessels of different size classes. The 95 percent post-2012 compliance figure reflects the SBMU annual report compilations integrating AIS monitoring, surface and aerial patrol data, and Caribbean MoU port-state-control follow-up.
Assumptions
The PSSA architecture rests on six assumptions. First, the binding ATBA under SOLAS V/10 provides effective enforcement reach against foreign-flag transit, with port-state-control follow-up through the Caribbean MoU and flag-state notification through Dutch diplomatic channels providing supplementary enforcement teeth. Second, the binding NAA over the bank summit prevents the principal benthic-impact risk from anchor and chain damage on coral and sponge habitat. Third, the Dutch Caribbean Coast Guard and Royal Netherlands Navy provide adequate surface and aerial surveillance for compliance monitoring and incident response. Fourth, the Saba Conservation Foundation through the SBMU provides operational management capacity sufficient for day-to-day patrol, scientific monitoring and stakeholder engagement. Fifth, the integration with the Ramsar designation, the BES National Park and the Yarari Sanctuary creates a multi-layered protection regime that compounds the IMO PSSA element. Sixth, the AIS-monitored compliance figure of approximately 95 percent reflects the actual operational record and provides an empirical basis for the binding-APM PSSA model in subsequent designation proposals.
Worked example
A Panamax bulk carrier of 75,000 dwt loaded at the Galveston bulk terminal bound for Rotterdam follows a great-circle through the Atlantic and the north-east Caribbean. The natural track passes well to the north of Saba Bank, through the Anegada Passage between Anguilla and the British Virgin Islands, with no operational interaction with the ATBA boundary. The PSSA imposes no measurable diversion cost; the operational requirement is voyage-planning awareness and adherence to the broader MARPOL Convention discharge restrictions plus the Annex V garbage Special Area discharge restrictions for the Wider Caribbean Region.
A Suezmax tanker of 160,000 dwt loaded at the Bonny Light terminal in Nigeria bound for the LOOP terminal in the Gulf of Mexico follows a track south of Saba Bank, through deep water in the central Caribbean basin, with no interaction with the ATBA. Again, no diversion cost beyond awareness.
A scientific research vessel of 800 GT operating under the Saba Conservation Foundation programme transits to a sampling station on the bank summit. The vessel is above the 500 GT NAA threshold and therefore must obtain a specific operational dispensation from the Dutch authorities for any anchoring at the sampling station, or alternatively must use dynamic positioning rather than anchoring. The PSSA architecture accommodates this scientific use case through the operational dispensation mechanism while preserving the benthic-impact protection objective.
A 50 GT Saban fishing vessel from Fort Bay engages in the traditional bank fishery for snapper and grouper. The vessel is below both the 300 GT ATBA threshold and the 500 GT NAA threshold and therefore is not affected by the IMO routeing measures, although the vessel remains subject to the Saba Bank National Park fisheries regulations administered by the Saba Conservation Foundation.
Edge cases and limits
Edge cases include: distress or genuine emergency, where SOLAS V/10 permits any vessel to deviate from any routeing measure with appropriate reporting (Dutch authorities require notification through the Saba VHF channel and through the Netherlands Caribbean Coast Guard); foreign sovereign-immune vessels including foreign navy vessels, where direct enforcement is constrained but bilateral arrangements may apply (the United States Coast Guard, French navy and Royal Navy have all observed the ATBA in practice); scientific research vessels needing to operate within the bank, where operational dispensations can be granted by the Dutch authorities; vessels with broken or transmitting-incorrect AIS, where intrusion detection relies on radar and aerial patrol; and a small but persistent issue with super-yacht and large recreational-vessel anchoring within the NAA, where the GT threshold may not capture all intended vessels.
The principal operational limits are the geographic isolation of Saba (a small population of approximately 1,900 with limited local enforcement infrastructure beyond the SBMU), the resource constraint on Dutch Caribbean Coast Guard patrol capacity across the broader 92,000 square kilometre EEZ, and the persistent challenge of recreational and commercial fishing pressure on bank fish stocks even within the National Park regime.
The principal scientific limits are the relative under-sampling of the deeper mesophotic bank slope habitat below 100 metres, the limited continuous time series for benthic community structure (although growing), and the ongoing research programme on humpback whale aggregation patterns and seasonal use intensity.
Regulatory basis
The regulatory basis is sevenfold. The IMO PSSA designation is Resolution MEPC.226(58) of October 2008. The PSSA framework is Resolution A.720(17) of 1991, refined through A.885(21) of 1999, A.927(22) of 29 November 2001, and A.982(24) of 1 December 2005. The binding routeing APMs (ATBA and NAA) are anchored in SOLAS Chapter V Regulation 10 under SOLAS Chapter V, as adopted by the MSC through MSC.1/Circ.1340 and consequential amendments to the IMO Ships’ Routeing publication. Discharge restrictions are anchored in MARPOL Annex I, in particular Regulation 15 oil discharge criteria, and the broader MARPOL Convention. The Dutch domestic basis includes the Nature Conservation Act for the BES Islands (Wet grondslagen natuurbeheer- en bescherming BES), the Caribbean Netherlands Public Bodies Act (WolBES), the Fisheries Act for the BES Islands, and the implementing regulations administered by the LNV ministry, the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, the Public Bodies of Saba and the Saba Conservation Foundation. The international legal context is UNCLOS Articles 211 and 192, the Convention on Biological Diversity of 1992 (Netherlands is a party), the Ramsar Convention, the Cartagena Convention 1983 and the SPAW Protocol 1990.
Common errors
Five errors recur in commercial and academic discussion of the Saba Bank PSSA. First, conflating the 2008 MEPC adoption date with the 2012 effective date of the binding APMs; the PSSA was designated in October 2008 but the ATBA and NAA only entered into force on 1 December 2012 after the four-year chart-update and operational phase-in. Second, treating Tubbataha as a Caribbean PSSA peer; Tubbataha is in the Sulu Sea in the western Pacific, not in the Caribbean. Third, assuming the Wider Caribbean Region is a MARPOL Annex I Special Area; it is currently only a MARPOL Annex V garbage Special Area, with the Annex I oil discharge regime governed by the general convention rules. Fourth, conflating the Saba Bank PSSA, the Saba Bank Ramsar site, the Saba Bank National Park and the Yarari Sanctuary, which have related but not identical boundaries and functions. Fifth, attributing the management role to the Dutch national government in isolation; the operational management is delegated through the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality to the Saba Conservation Foundation through the Saba Bank Management Unit, with the BES public-body and the Saban community providing the local-governance and stakeholder context.
See also
- Particularly Sensitive Sea Area framework overview
- Particularly Sensitive Sea Area: Sabana-Camagüey Archipelago
- Particularly Sensitive Sea Area: Tubbataha Reefs
- Particularly Sensitive Sea Area: Galapagos Archipelago
- Particularly Sensitive Sea Area: Great Barrier Reef
- Particularly Sensitive Sea Area: Wadden Sea
- Particularly Sensitive Sea Area: Western European Waters
- Particularly Sensitive Sea Area: Baltic Sea
- Particularly Sensitive Sea Area: Papahānaumokuākea
- Wider Caribbean Region
- Cartagena Convention 1983
- SPAW Protocol 1990
- RAMSAR Convention
- UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Programme
- MARPOL Convention
- MARPOL Annex I
- MARPOL Annex I Regulation 15 oil discharge criteria
- SOLAS Chapter V
- Calculator catalogue
References
References include the IMO PSSA portal, Resolution MEPC.226(58) of October 2008, Assembly Resolution A.982(24) of 1 December 2005, the IMO Ships’ Routeing publication including the Saba Bank ATBA and No-Anchoring Area entries effective 1 December 2012, the Dutch submission documentation through MEPC 57/19 and NAV 54 papers, the Ramsar Information Sheet for site 1957 (Saba Bank, Netherlands, designated 8 February 2012), the Saba Conservation Foundation and Saba Bank Management Unit annual reports, the Dutch Caribbean Biodiversity Database Saba Bank ecosystem records, the Cartagena Convention 1983 and SPAW Protocol 1990 instruments, the Convention on Biological Diversity Netherlands country profile, and IUCN Marine Protected Areas programme materials. Full citation links appear in the frontmatter.
Related calculators
- CO₂ Cylinder Bank (Machinery Space)
- Battery Bank - Cycle Life vs Discharge
- MEPC.300(72) - BWMS type approval (G8)
- MEPC.259(68) - BWMS D-2 performance standard
- MEPC.184(59) - EGCS wash-water discharge limits
- IMO MEPC.227(64) - STP revised effluent standard
- IMO MEPC.159(55) - STP effluent standard
- IMO MEPC.107(49) - Oil filtering equipment 15 ppm